class_0 <- sample(1:2^K, N, replace = L)
Alphas_0 <- matrix(0,N,K)
for(i in 1:N){
Alphas_0[i,] <- inv_bijectionvector(K,(class_0[i]-1))
}
thetas_true = rnorm(N,0,1)
tausd_true=0.5
taus_true = rnorm(N,0,tausd_true)
G_version = 3
phi_true = 0.8
lambdas_true <- c(-2, 1.6, .4, .055) # empirical from Wang 2017
Alphas <- sim_alphas(model="HO_sep",
lambdas=lambdas_true,
thetas=thetas_true,
Q_matrix=Q_matrix,
Design_array=Design_array)
table(rowSums(Alphas[,,5]) - rowSums(Alphas[,,1])) # used to see how much transition has taken place
#>
#> 0 1 2 3 4
#> 60 53 91 118 28
itempars_true <- matrix(runif(J*2,.1,.2), ncol=2)
RT_itempars_true <- matrix(NA, nrow=J, ncol=2)
RT_itempars_true[,2] <- rnorm(J,3.45,.5)
RT_itempars_true[,1] <- runif(J,1.5,2)
Y_sim <- sim_hmcdm(model="DINA",Alphas,Q_matrix,Design_array,
itempars=itempars_true)
L_sim <- sim_RT(Alphas,Q_matrix,Design_array,RT_itempars_true,taus_true,phi_true,G_version)output_HMDCM_RT_sep = hmcdm(Y_sim,Q_matrix,"DINA_HO_RT_sep",Design_array,
100, 30,
Latency_array = L_sim, G_version = G_version,
theta_propose = 2,deltas_propose = c(.45,.35,.25,.06))
#> 0
output_HMDCM_RT_sep
#>
#> Model: DINA_HO_RT_sep
#>
#> Sample Size: 350
#> Number of Items:
#> Number of Time Points:
#>
#> Chain Length: 100, burn-in: 50
summary(output_HMDCM_RT_sep)
#>
#> Model: DINA_HO_RT_sep
#>
#> Item Parameters:
#> ss_EAP gs_EAP
#> 0.1362 0.05087
#> 0.1713 0.15240
#> 0.1057 0.02971
#> 0.1439 0.19860
#> 0.1489 0.11030
#> ... 45 more items
#>
#> Transition Parameters:
#> lambdas_EAP
#> λ0 -1.71639
#> λ1 1.40140
#> λ2 0.24927
#> λ3 0.06829
#>
#> Class Probabilities:
#> pis_EAP
#> 0000 0.1745
#> 0001 0.1657
#> 0010 0.1666
#> 0011 0.2243
#> 0100 0.1830
#> ... 11 more classes
#>
#> Deviance Information Criterion (DIC): 158101.6
#>
#> Posterior Predictive P-value (PPP):
#> M1: 0.5132
#> M2: 0.49
#> total scores: 0.6245
a <- summary(output_HMDCM_RT_sep)
head(a$ss_EAP)
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.1362199
#> [2,] 0.1713273
#> [3,] 0.1057276
#> [4,] 0.1439124
#> [5,] 0.1489260
#> [6,] 0.1808849(cor_thetas <- cor(thetas_true,a$thetas_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.7592294
(cor_taus <- cor(taus_true,a$response_times_coefficients$taus_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.9853415
(cor_ss <- cor(as.vector(itempars_true[,1]),a$ss_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.6145683
(cor_gs <- cor(as.vector(itempars_true[,2]),a$gs_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.6935568
AAR_vec <- numeric(L)
for(t in 1:L){
AAR_vec[t] <- mean(Alphas[,,t]==a$Alphas_est[,,t])
}
AAR_vec
#> [1] 0.9314286 0.9278571 0.9528571 0.9564286 0.9571429
PAR_vec <- numeric(L)
for(t in 1:L){
PAR_vec[t] <- mean(rowSums((Alphas[,,t]-a$Alphas_est[,,t])^2)==0)
}
PAR_vec
#> [1] 0.7600000 0.7400000 0.8171429 0.8314286 0.8485714a$DIC
#> Transition Response_Time Response Joint Total
#> D_bar 2441.623 136660.7 15035.41 3110.544 157248.3
#> D(theta_bar) 2185.079 136216.3 14905.14 3088.514 156395.0
#> DIC 2698.167 137105.2 15165.67 3132.574 158101.6
head(a$PPP_total_scores)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.88 0.62 0.82 0.82 0.80
#> [2,] 0.74 0.30 1.00 0.44 0.88
#> [3,] 0.86 0.56 1.00 0.58 0.04
#> [4,] 0.40 0.50 0.48 0.28 0.54
#> [5,] 0.72 0.88 0.72 0.92 0.74
#> [6,] 0.74 1.00 0.90 0.62 0.26
head(a$PPP_item_means)
#> [1] 0.30 0.52 0.38 0.52 0.54 0.64
head(a$PPP_item_ORs)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14]
#> [1,] NA 0.64 0.50 0.34 0.62 0.84 0.94 0.40 0.76 0.58 0.68 0.96 0.92 0.90
#> [2,] NA NA 0.42 0.84 0.40 0.34 0.76 0.36 0.80 0.52 0.82 1.00 0.98 0.20
#> [3,] NA NA NA 0.32 0.46 0.86 0.44 0.66 0.54 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.42 0.22
#> [4,] NA NA NA NA 0.88 0.96 0.54 0.80 0.58 0.28 0.72 1.00 0.96 0.66
#> [5,] NA NA NA NA NA 0.44 0.68 0.78 0.60 0.42 0.96 0.88 0.90 0.64
#> [6,] NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.52 0.60 0.96 0.80 0.68 0.62 0.66 0.28
#> [,15] [,16] [,17] [,18] [,19] [,20] [,21] [,22] [,23] [,24] [,25] [,26]
#> [1,] 0.52 0.92 0.62 0.30 0.78 0.92 0.22 0.62 0.30 0.28 0.50 0.06
#> [2,] 0.76 0.34 0.40 0.72 0.62 0.18 0.94 0.06 0.56 0.26 0.60 0.02
#> [3,] 0.80 1.00 0.86 0.78 0.88 0.76 0.68 0.60 0.12 0.44 0.08 0.58
#> [4,] 0.82 0.68 0.94 0.66 0.56 0.52 0.12 0.98 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.34
#> [5,] 0.94 0.90 0.28 0.80 0.82 0.56 0.18 0.64 0.70 0.30 0.32 0.10
#> [6,] 0.26 0.58 0.02 0.90 0.52 0.44 0.00 0.68 0.18 0.34 0.16 0.02
#> [,27] [,28] [,29] [,30] [,31] [,32] [,33] [,34] [,35] [,36] [,37] [,38]
#> [1,] 0.70 0.36 0.34 0.02 0.76 0.04 0.70 0.52 0.50 0.68 0.84 0.94
#> [2,] 0.20 0.00 0.54 0.12 0.32 0.66 0.86 0.24 0.14 0.46 0.22 0.88
#> [3,] 0.34 0.70 0.88 0.62 0.18 0.90 1.00 0.68 0.08 0.60 0.62 0.58
#> [4,] 0.90 0.74 0.92 0.72 0.32 0.48 0.32 0.74 0.16 0.76 0.98 0.50
#> [5,] 0.72 0.78 0.44 0.82 0.72 0.12 0.18 0.78 0.46 0.22 0.36 0.76
#> [6,] 0.96 0.16 0.62 0.36 0.00 0.08 0.76 0.96 0.20 0.48 0.40 0.18
#> [,39] [,40] [,41] [,42] [,43] [,44] [,45] [,46] [,47] [,48] [,49] [,50]
#> [1,] 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.64 0.80 0.48 0.32 0.80 0.40 0.44 0.94 0.94
#> [2,] 0.28 0.66 0.50 0.40 0.20 0.48 0.10 0.72 0.38 0.64 0.66 0.90
#> [3,] 0.68 0.60 0.66 0.90 0.56 0.20 0.40 0.90 0.54 0.88 0.04 0.76
#> [4,] 0.78 0.04 0.72 0.74 0.62 0.48 0.42 0.46 0.30 0.96 0.50 0.98
#> [5,] 0.02 0.40 0.84 0.80 0.70 0.14 0.14 0.96 0.34 0.86 0.78 0.30
#> [6,] 0.64 0.02 0.40 0.92 0.64 0.00 0.18 0.70 0.06 0.72 0.06 0.50
library(bayesplot)
#> This is bayesplot version 1.15.0
#> - Online documentation and vignettes at mc-stan.org/bayesplot
#> - bayesplot theme set to bayesplot::theme_default()
#> * Does _not_ affect other ggplot2 plots
#> * See ?bayesplot_theme_set for details on theme setting
pp_check(output_HMDCM_RT_sep, type="total_latency")